Lean user

research program

Lean user research

I architected and implemented a lean user research program that established a consistent feedback loop with users, delivering actionable insights while maintaining engineering momentum.

I architected and implemented a lean user research program that established a consistent feedback loop with users, delivering actionable insights while maintaining engineering momentum.

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

The problem

Our organization faced challenges with inconsistent user feedback due to unclear ROI, low stakeholder engagement, and time constraints. I addressed this by developing efficient, impactful research methods that ensured user insights directly informed product and business decisions, reducing missed opportunities and costly rework.

challengeS:

C-Suite: Struggles to engage with and trust user research when actionable insights and clear ROI are lacking.

Engineers & Designers: Late-stage research leads to rushed implementation and costly rework.

Researchers: Time-intensive interview prep and inconsistent stakeholder engagement dilute the impact of insights.

Sales (B2B): Lacks robust data to validate customer pain points, making it harder to tailor solutions and close deals.

Customer Service: Collects feedback but lacks tools to validate insights or drive product improvements, missing user-driven opportunities.

GOALS:

C-Suite: Align research with business goals, demonstrate ROI, encourage participation in research, and support business strategy.

Engineers & Designers: Share findings in smaller, actionable chunks to reduce rework. Minimize release delays.

Researchers: Streamline processes to save time and boost stakeholder engagement.

Sales (B2B): Equip teams with validated data to address customer needs and close deals.

Customer Service: Turn feedback into actionable product improvements.

All Groups: Centralize validation of pain points and ideas to ensure insights inform decisions.

Blockers:

False consensus bias
Non-actionable insights
Unclear ROI

The problem

Faced with inconsistent user feedback, I developed efficient research methods to clarify ROI, boost stakeholder engagement, and deliver insights that informed decisions, reducing missed opportunities and costly rework.

challengeS:

C-Suite: Struggles to engage with and trust user research when actionable insights and clear ROI are lacking.

Engineers & Designers: Late-stage research leads to rushed implementation and costly rework.

Researchers: Time-intensive interview prep and inconsistent stakeholder engagement dilute the impact of insights.

Sales (B2B): Lacks robust data to validate customer pain points, making it harder to tailor solutions and close deals.

Customer Service: Collects feedback but lacks tools to validate insights or drive product improvements, missing user-driven opportunities.

GOALS:

C-Suite: Align research with business goals, demonstrate ROI, encourage participation in research, and support business strategy.

Engineers & Designers: Share findings in smaller, actionable chunks to reduce rework. Minimize release delays.

Researchers: Streamline processes to save time and boost stakeholder engagement.

Sales (B2B): Equip teams with validated data to address customer needs and close deals.

Customer Service: Turn feedback into actionable product improvements.

All Groups: Centralize validation of pain points and ideas to ensure insights inform decisions.

Blockers:

False consensus bias
Non-actionable insights
Unclear ROI

Solutions

Standing research day
  • Establishes a routine of collecting and reflecting on feedback, signaling a commitment to ongoing improvement.

  • Less disruptive to teams.

  • Easier to involve cross-functional groups.

Ongoing micro-studies
  • Quicker feedback loops make it easier to pivot.

  • Continuous feedback to engineers as they work in parrallel.

  • Less analysis overload

Just enough research

I adapted the Eisenhower Matrix to guide how much user research to do on a project. It balances stakeholder buy-in and helps decide when to dig deep or stay pragmatic, avoiding delays unless major risks arise.

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Pain points:

Stakeholders: Struggle to engage with and trust user research when actionable insights and clear ROI are lacking.

Engineers & Designers: Late-stage research leads to rushed implementation and costly rework.

Researchers: Time-intensive interview prep and inconsistent stakeholder engagement dilute the impact of insights.

Sales (B2B): Lacks robust data to validate customer pain points, making it harder to tailor solutions and close deals.

Customer Service: Collects feedback but lacks tools to validate insights or drive product improvements, missing user-driven opportunities.

GOALS:

Stakeholders: Research aligned with business goals, demonstrated ROI, engaged participation, and feel supported in business strategy.

Engineers & Designers: Receives small actionable insights to reduce rework. Minimize release delays.

Researchers: Enjoys streamlined processes and consistently
honing skills.

Sales (B2B): Are equipped with validated data to address customer needs to close deals.

Customer Service: See customer pain points resolved, feel included, and engage in research.

Solutions

Lean user research breakdown: Senior Design Director Yvonne Doll
Standing research day
  • Establishes a routine of collecting and reflecting on feedback, signaling a commitment to ongoing improvement.

  • Less disruptive to teams.

  • Easier to involve cross-functional groups.

Ongoing micro-studies
  • Quicker feedback loops make it easier to pivot.

  • Continuous feedback to engineers as they work in parrallel.

  • Less analysis overload

Just enough research

The Eisenhower Matrix, a time-management tool for prioritizing tasks by urgency and importance, inspired my decision-making framework for determining how much or how little user research to conduct on any given project. Adapting it to balance stakeholder buy-in helps clarify when to prioritize in-depth study and be pragmatic, ensuring we support development without unnecessary delays—unless a significant risk is identified.

Just enough research:Senior Design Director Yvonne Doll
Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

The solution

Standing research day
  • Establishes a routine of collecting and reflecting on feedback, signaling a commitment to ongoing improvement.

  • Less disruptive to teams.

  • Easier to involve cross-functional groups.

Ongoing micro-studies
  • Quicker feedback loops make it easier to pivot.

  • Continuous feedback to engineers as they work in parrallel.

  • Less analysis overload

challenges:

C-Suite: Struggles to engage with and trust user research when actionable insights and clear ROI are lacking.

Engineers & Designers: Late-stage research leads to rushed implementation and costly rework.

Researchers: Time-intensive interview prep and inconsistent stakeholder engagement dilute the impact of insights.

Sales (B2B): Lacks robust data to validate customer pain points, making it harder to tailor solutions and close deals.

Customer Service: Collects feedback but lacks tools to validate insights or drive product improvements, missing user-driven opportunities.

GOALS:

C-Suite: Align research with business goals, demonstrate ROI, encourage participation in research, and support business strategy.

Engineers & Designers: Share findings in smaller, actionable chunks to reduce rework. Minimize release delays.

Researchers: Streamline processes to save time and boost stakeholder engagement.

Sales (B2B): Equip teams with validated data to address customer needs and close deals.

Customer Service: Turn feedback into actionable product improvements.

All Groups: Centralize validation of pain points and ideas to ensure insights inform decisions.

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

On the subject

I had the great pleasure speaking at Lesbians Who Tch in September 2024. My topic was agile user research and uncovering actionable insights from users, data, and beyond.

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights

Impact Numbers

~250

User Interviews

~375

Usability Tests

~175

Insights